Re: Static routes issue with two gateways.
Lee Sharp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 04/28/2011 08:00 AM, Adam Stasiak wrote: > Nice and simple but unless I'm missing something I don't think it would > work. The remote firewalls FW2 and FW3 would have no idea of which VPN > tunnel to use (FW1A or FW1B) since they both share the same subnet ( > 10.100.1.0/24). Obviously I can split the site into subnets (10.100.1.0/25and > 10.100.1.128/25) or something like that, but at that point I'd rather deal > with static routes on the client PCs. Am I missing something here, or is > there some way to make the above work? It is not the route from them to you, but from you to them. FW1B has no route to FW2 or FW3. A static route may work, but only in the proper order... Lee