Re: Increase number of available ip-addresses
Ralf Petry <[email protected]> Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:56:55 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks. quoting: Also, when you get a few hundred wireless users on one flat network, live will suck for most of them. I can imagine that, nevertheless, it is wanted to have the possibility of having a few hundred wireless users.... quoting: You could run multiple firewalls... (Or multiple interfaces, but captive portal can only run on one of them.) no chance for that... best regards... ralf. Am 12.09.13 21:06, schrieb Lee Sharp: > On 09/12/2013 04:39 AM, Ralf Petry wrote: >> Hy, (note in advance: my English might be a bit, well, rusty...) >> I'm using m0n0wall mainly with the Voucher function. I understand, that >> the number of available ip-addresses given by the DHCP-Server is >> limited. Nevertheless, I have been asked, if there was the possibility >> to include more than 250 ip-requests. (Don't ask me about the sense...) >> The only way I could imagine, is, with allowing my WLAN-Access Points to >> set up their own subnets and route to the m0n0wall instead of passing >> through the adress-requests from the clients. >> >> Would there be another possibility (e.g. with more subnets dealt by the >> DHCP-service of m0n0wall itself)? > > Ditch class C. 172.16.0.0 is class b, and commonly 255.255.0.0 and > 10.0.0.0 is class a, commonly 255.0.0.0. > > While you can make you class c larger with 192.168.0.0/23 you may have > issues with some applications that do not like classless routing that > gets larger. > > Also, when you get a few hundred wireless users on one flat network, > live will suck for most of them. You could run multiple firewalls... > (Or multiple interfaces, but captive portal can only run on one of them.) > > Lee > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >