Re: MTU 1640
Johan Vanderwesthuizen <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Dec 2014 04:18:06 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The default MTU, size of 1500-byte MTU, or somewhat smaller is sufficient be= cause Ethernet frames are limited to a standard maximum of 1500 bytes of pay= load data. Various IEEE standards use expanded frame sizes to carry addition= al information. Don't spend to much time with the MTU size at first. Verify w= hat are the speed and duplex settings and actually check the results first, b= efore troubleshooting layer 3 and 4 issues. Well, this is my 2c from dealing= with PPPoE/VPN issues in the past. Another test you can run, once connected= , is to change the MTU size from the command line and see at what value does= an ping fails when modifying the MTU size/value. You will notice if you mak= e the MTU size to small, the ping will fail/timed out. Troubleshooting MTU s= ize and fragmented packers are really hard to figure out. Wireshark will add= some light to the works, depending "where" you you capture the network traf= fic. (Encrypted vs unencrypted) Hope this info will put you on the right tra= ck.=20 > On Dec 26, 2014, at 3:12 AM, Jakob Schwienbacher track<jakob.schwienbacher= @gmail.com> wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Im running M0n0wall 1.8.1. Im using PPPoE to connect to my ISP. I had some= > trouble with MTU size, then i saw my WAN MUT is set to 1460: >=20 > $ ifconfig > ~ > ngwan0: flags=3D88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metri= c 0 > mtu 1460 > ~ >=20 > I went to Interfaces > WAN and set the MTU to 1492 (which should be the > Maximum possible on PPPoE links). The MTU setting is visible on the UI and= > in the config file also after a reboot. >=20 >=20 > $ cat /var/etc/mpd.conf > startup: >=20 > pppoe: > create bundle static B1 > ~ > set link mtu 1492 > ~ >=20 > I disconnected and reconected my WAN interface, I did a reboot of my > m0n0wall. But the MTU doesn`t get changed. It remains on 1460. >=20 > 1. Does anybody see the same issue? >=20 > 2. Someon know about the value 1460? I couldn't find anything about that. >=20 >=20 > Thanks in advance, >=20 > Jakob