Re: alternatives to m0n0
Francisco Artes <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:50:45 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.m0n0wall |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--Apple-Mail=_DB8E80DE-D343-4446-81A1-A0127C4D2F11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Happy to help continue the project if we are allowed to do so. I use = pFsense on soekris 6501 and it runs fine - But I like having a firewall = that is=85 well a firewall, not a UTM on a tiny hardware platform.=20 On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:38 AM, [email protected] wrote: > FWIW, when my comcast connection went from 25/5 Mbps to 50/10 Mbps I = was compelled to move from an ALIX board from Netgate to something = running a 1 GHz CPU. 30 Mbps seems to be about all that the smaller = SBCs can handle, even with a really simple setup. >=20 > There's a lot of middle ground between what m0n0wall is and where = pfsense has gone.=20 >=20 > Michael Graves > [email protected] > http://www.mgraves.org > o(713) 861-4005 > c(713) 201-1262 > sip:[email protected] > skype mjgraves >=20 >=20 > --------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] = alternatives to m0n0 > From: "Lee Sharp" <[email protected]> > Date: 2/18/15 9:00 am > To: [email protected] >=20 > On 02/18/2015 08:44 AM, Klaus Stock wrote: >> as hard as it may sound...occasionally, we need to invest into new >> hardware. As much as I would like to re-use my old (retired) WRAPs, I >> have to copy with the fact that hardware demands had picked up with >> the 1.3 version, while the ISPs deviously continued to upgrade >> connection speeds. >=20 > And that is a good reason. But I have dozens of firewalls out there=20 > running fine with lots of head room on m0n0wall, that will not at all=20= > support OpenSense. No, there is a place for a small build firewall. >=20 > Lee >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --Apple-Mail=_DB8E80DE-D343-4446-81A1-A0127C4D2F11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJU5LTVAAoJEBdgnhiCBnH6KzgIAKAsOTlpPxW35DMQt+uS5tnD FsCdjToEjNTkb8Fcx9KxZET09oCED36MS0dSCsxmQ6hXBaT+KTTScotd5ntvPNs8 zQDD36/JK7MqN98n/xqjDQj+pn2iHyX/SxC1D+3RVMJ54hkfvmFcFFoeIFcoz5Jo fM8J/l+n/AqRRz5ibBo8XViqe8HvYOxdGPQKW3L/zWrA9k1Hk4IL7s/Uh5JK80Ho Xx8YENyRW4KMmOcFniD1tLaabKU8Zffan7/KMBYiE7xKudmMWivI0eMy8KyFvPMD 9Qs9YaZV+GH/xRgRB/W05WHynU4R0IXi36ixreZUACl+TDbKGMJM803maHPFwuY= =4n8m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_DB8E80DE-D343-4446-81A1-A0127C4D2F11--