Re: [PATCH iptables] nft: bridge: fix among buffer overflow when set has no size
Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]> Fri, 31 Jul 2026 13:33:12 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <amyH-DnOnds5cOAf@chamomile> |
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 06:56:58PM +0000, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote:
> The among match parser sizes its pair buffer from NFTNL_SET_DESC_SIZE:
>
> cnt = nftnl_set_get_u32(s, NFTNL_SET_DESC_SIZE);
> ...
> size = cnt * sizeof(struct nft_among_pair);
> match->m = xtables_calloc(1, size);
> ...
> set_elems_to_among_pairs(among_data->pairs + poff, s, cnt);
>
> NFTNL_SET_DESC_SIZE is the hash-table size hint, which is only present
> when the set was created with an explicit "size". A set created without
> one (e.g. via plain nft: add set bridge filter s { type ether_addr; })
> carries no NFTA_SET_DESC_SIZE, so nftnl_set_get_u32() returns 0. The
> buffer is then allocated header-only while set_elems_to_among_pairs()
> still walks every element of the set and writes one nft_among_pair each,
> overflowing the allocation on the first element. Listing such a ruleset
> with ebtables-nft -L (or ebtables-nft-restore) corrupts the heap.
I assume this is triggered by a crafted set not created by iptables-nft.
Fortify instead set_elems_to_among_pairs() so it does not crash
instead.
> Size the buffer from the actual number of set elements instead, i.e.
> exactly what set_elems_to_among_pairs() iterates over. Sets created by
> the among match itself are unaffected: their element count equals the
> NFTNL_SET_DESC_SIZE that was used before.
>
> Fixes: 26753888720d ("nft: bridge: Rudimental among extension support")
> Signed-off-by: Omkhar Arasaratnam <[email protected]>
> ---
> iptables/nft-ruleparse-bridge.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/iptables/nft-ruleparse-bridge.c b/iptables/nft-ruleparse-bridge.c
> index aee08b13..fc877d43 100644
> --- a/iptables/nft-ruleparse-bridge.c
> +++ b/iptables/nft-ruleparse-bridge.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,23 @@ static struct nftnl_set *set_from_lookup_expr(struct nft_xt_ctx *ctx,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +static uint32_t set_elem_count(const struct nftnl_set *s)
> +{
> + struct nftnl_set_elems_iter *iter = nftnl_set_elems_iter_create(s);
> + uint32_t cnt = 0;
> +
> + if (!iter)
> + xtables_error(OTHER_PROBLEM,
> + "BUG: set elems iter allocation failed");
> +
> + while (nftnl_set_elems_iter_next(iter))
> + cnt++;
> +
> + nftnl_set_elems_iter_destroy(iter);
> +
> + return cnt;
> +}
> +
> static void nft_bridge_parse_lookup(struct nft_xt_ctx *ctx,
> struct nftnl_expr *e)
> {
> @@ -328,7 +345,10 @@ static void nft_bridge_parse_lookup(struct nft_xt_ctx *ctx,
> &is_dst, &have_ip))
> return;
>
> - cnt = nftnl_set_get_u32(s, NFTNL_SET_DESC_SIZE);
> + /* NFTNL_SET_DESC_SIZE is unset for sets without an explicit size, so
> + * count the actual elements instead of trusting it.
> + */
> + cnt = set_elem_count(s);
>
> for (ematch = ctx->cs->match_list; ematch; ematch = ematch->next) {
> if (!ematch->ismatch || strcmp(ematch->u.match->name, "among"))
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> — oa