Re: [PATCH nf-next,v5] netfilter: flowtable: initial bridge support
kernel test robot <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Aug 2026 09:27:39 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Pablo, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on netfilter-nf/main] [also build test ERROR on nf-next/main linus/master v7.2-rc6 next-20260805] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Pablo-Neira-Ayuso/netfilter-flowtable-initial-bridge-support/20260805-124729 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf.git main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260713123650.1656551-1-pablo%40netfilter.org patch subject: [PATCH nf-next,v5] netfilter: flowtable: initial bridge support config: loongarch-randconfig-001-20260806 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260806/[email protected]/config) compiler: clang version 22.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project e9846648fd6183ee6d8cbdb4502213fcf902a211) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260806/[email protected]/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c:153:21: error: call to undeclared function 'nf_bridge_info_exists'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 153 | if (!pkt->flags || nf_bridge_info_exists(pkt->skb)) | ^ 1 error generated. vim +/nf_bridge_info_exists +153 net/netfilter/nft_flow_offload.c 138 139 static void nft_flow_offload_bridge_eval(const struct nft_expr *expr, 140 struct nft_regs *regs, 141 const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt) 142 { 143 struct nft_flow_offload *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr); 144 struct nf_flowtable *flowtable = &priv->flowtable->data; 145 struct tcphdr _tcph, *tcph = NULL; 146 enum ip_conntrack_info ctinfo; 147 struct flow_offload *flow; 148 enum ip_conntrack_dir dir; 149 struct nf_conn *ct; 150 int ret; 151 152 /* Is this a non-IP packet or br_netfilter? If so, skip. */ > 153 if (!pkt->flags || nf_bridge_info_exists(pkt->skb)) 154 goto out; 155 156 ct = nf_ct_get(pkt->skb, &ctinfo); 157 if (!ct || !nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct)) 158 goto out; 159 160 /* Unlikely, conntrack bridge should not see neither helpers nor NAT in 161 * the bridge forward path. 162 */ 163 if (nf_ct_ext_exist(ct, NF_CT_EXT_HELPER) || 164 ct->status & (IPS_SEQ_ADJUST | IPS_NAT_CLASH)) 165 goto out; 166 167 switch (ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple.dst.protonum) { 168 case IPPROTO_TCP: 169 tcph = skb_header_pointer(pkt->skb, nft_thoff(pkt), 170 sizeof(_tcph), &_tcph); 171 if (unlikely(!tcph || tcph->fin || tcph->rst || 172 !nf_conntrack_tcp_established(ct))) 173 goto out; 174 break; 175 case IPPROTO_UDP: 176 break; 177 default: 178 goto out; 179 } 180 181 if (test_and_set_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &ct->status)) 182 goto out; 183 184 flow = flow_offload_alloc(ct); 185 if (!flow) 186 goto err_flow_forward; 187 188 dir = CTINFO2DIR(ctinfo); 189 if (nft_flow_bridge(flow, pkt, dir, priv->flowtable) < 0) 190 goto err_flow_add; 191 192 if (tcph) 193 flow_offload_ct_tcp(ct); 194 195 __set_bit(NF_FLOW_HW_BIDIRECTIONAL, &flow->flags); 196 ret = flow_offload_add(flowtable, flow); 197 if (ret < 0) 198 goto err_flow_add; 199 200 return; 201 202 err_flow_add: 203 flow_offload_free(flow); 204 err_flow_forward: 205 clear_bit(IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT, &ct->status); 206 out: 207 regs->verdict.code = NFT_BREAK; 208 } 209 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki