Re: [nf_tables] pipapo: inserting an interval that strictly contains an existing one is accepted; rbtree rejects the same insert
Wei Fang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel,gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANE+tVr69qqyreBbWWk_2FqpMfQAqde-JF=weECditGJF=uZ3g@mail.gmail.com> |
Maybe I’ve made a mistake? I thought the behaviors of these two backends would be consistent. On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 6:20 PM Florian Westphal <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wei Fang <[email protected]> wrote: > > ------------------- > > expected: both backends reject the overlapping insert (-EEXIST) > > Why?