Re: [nf_tables] rbtree interval set: in one batch, re-adding element E0 makes deleting an unrelated interval E1 fail with -ENOENT
Wei Fang <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel,gmane.linux.network |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANE+tVq_U0dM7hXE3Vn5VVFR5iFD_JoSfQv0ZVn28RuepUy0cw@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, Understood - thank you for the explanation. I accept the ordering point: the reproducer's delete message sent the END element before the START element of its interval, which does not follow the element ordering this interface relies on. Thanks again for your time. Best regards,