Re: [PATCH nf v3] netfilter: disable br_netfilter in user namespaces

Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 31/08/2026 18:11, Florian Westphal wrote:
> br_netfilter has way too many bugs, schedule for removal and disable
> the feature in user namespaces.
> 
> In particular, we get more and more gadgets to have bridge ports escape
> rcu_read_lock() protection, then underlying device gets reconfigured
> (macvlan or something else), then reinject into network stack causes
> crash because net_device is assumed to still have bridge rx data
> associated with it.
> 
> br_netfilter is an ancient kludge that emulates ip stack from within the
> bridge and then calls into ipv4/ipv6 netfilter hooks to have bridged
> frames processed via iptables/ip6tables by setting the 'call-iptables'
> sysctls to 1. It is NOT related to ebtables or nftables 'bridge' family
> at all.
> 
> Note that in addition to call-iptables, sysctls, the bridge also exposes
> call-iptables per bridge device via netlink and sysfs
> ('BROPT_NF_CALL_IPTABLES') toggles.
> 
> Those are still available, the brnet structure is scoped to br_netfilter;
> exposing it bridge-wide is a big no-no.
> 
> This relies on brnf_device_event() no longer registering the base
> br_netfilter hooks, so while BROPT_NF_CALL_IPTABLES can be set, it
> has no effect because the hooks that evaluate this feature bit
> are never registered.
> 
> brnf_init_net can no longer depend on CONFIG_SYSCTL, else such builds
> never disable support in user namespaces.
> 
> Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
> ---
>   v3: also update Documentation, correct changelog: toggle is
>   per bridge device, not per bridge port (Nik)
> 
>   Documentation/networking/bridge.rst |  5 +++--
>   net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c     | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>   2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 

LGTM, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.