Re: [PATCH 6.1.y 6.6.y] netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: restore cloned mapping table memcg accounting
Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.devel,gmane.linux.kernel.stable,gmane.linux.network,gmane.linux.kernel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <apitu8BYUvG-WJt2@chamomile> |
On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 06:14:13PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Fixes: a4983e89e3b1 ("netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not rely on ZERO_SIZE_PTR")
> > Fixes: 32bad10de347 ("netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: do not rely on ZERO_SIZE_PTR")
> >
> > This two Fixes: tag do not make any sense to me.
>
> > The two Fixes tags are for the two stable branches:
> >
> > - a4983e89e3b1 is the 6.1.y backport
> > - 32bad10de347 is the 6.6.y backport
> >
> > I am not sure what the usual preference is here: one common patch with
> > both Fixes tags, or separate patches for each tree. Which do you prefer?
>
> Whatever Pablo prefers :)
I am fine either way. I just got confused with the double Fixes: tag
that point to the -stable tree commit hash (if I understood correctly
after Karl's explaination).