Re: Clarification of the procedure for filtering IP option fields

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 06:49:41PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 04:52:29PM +0300, Alexey Kashavkin wrote:
> > Hello, 
> > 
> > I am still figuring out the syntax for adding rules to filter IP
> > options. Please, if anyone has an understanding of how this works
> > give at least a short reply.
> 
> This 'type' field is redundant.
> 
> > I understand how the exthdr expression works in the kernel code. But
> > so far there is still a question about specifying the type field,
> > what is the purpose of this field here? There is also a question
> > about other fields, let's take for example the IP option LSRR, it
> > has an addr field. I assume, knowing this option from RFC791 it
> > specifies IP addresses, but in the case of nft it is not so, this
> > field has datatype intereger.
> 
> Yes, this should be at least 32-bits.

Actually, this is 32-bits already:

# nft describe ip option lsrr addr
exthdr expression, datatype integer (integer), 32 bits