Re: list elements of set
Slavko <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Sep 2025 19:54:14 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.netfilter.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dňa 27. septembra 2025 19:19:42 UTC používateľ Kerin Millar <[email protected]> napísal: >On Sat, 27 Sep 2025, at 6:24 PM, Slavko wrote: >> Dňa 27. septembra 2025 10:59:54 UTC používateľ Kerin Millar >> 1. the nftables is list of objects, thus one must first filter the "metadata" >> object, it is first list item, but who know if it is guaranted > >I don't think this particular criticism carries much weight. I understand how are metadata useful, and i do not ask to omit it, but my idea is/was that "nftables" can be object (instead of list): {"nftables": { "metadata": {...}, "sets": [ {...}, ... ] }} Thus one can just use: jq ".nftables.sets[]" Instead of ugly: jq ''.nftables[1:][].set' Or too long: jq '.nftables[] | select(.set != null).set' regards -- Slavko https://www.slavino.sk/