Re: Problem with list?!

Paul Tansom wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:59:18 -0400
> taharka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>geblaat wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Just wondering.....
>>
>>Yes, no activity for a few days. Smoothwall running smoothly or a 
>>problem with the list?
> 
> Well I'd been thinking there was little activity for months now, but then I noticed (well, remembered I guess, as I think I do remember them being announced - probably!) that there are web forums. Whereas I will dip into a mailing list and scan the subjects and respond, I will rarely (if ever) drop into a web forum and see what is going on unless I have a specific problem. They look pretty active though, so it's nice to see that SmoothWall is not dead. My ageing 1.0 install will be meeting its maker soon though and replaced by a hand rolled Debian box. SmoothWall was not designed for the flexibility I require now (and I'm not saying it should be).

dead?  what made you think it would be? :)  What flexibility are you after 
mr whaletales, as there are plenty mods now that add on some stunning levels 
of functionality to express ... (hint: check the mods forum on 
community.smoothwall.org :)

-- 
_ __/|  William Anderson      | Brodie: The Force is strong with this one
\`O_o'  neuro at well dot com |    Jay: Dude, don't encourage him
=(_ _)= http://neuro.me.uk/   |  -- Mallrats, (1995)
    U  - Thhbt! GPG 0xFA5F1100 |
_______________________________________________
gpl mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.smoothwall.org/mailman/listinfo/gpl

SmoothWall Stash - Buy Our Stuff! http://cafepress.com/smoothwall