Re: PCI DSS & Firewalls

[email protected] (Jim Seymour)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Paul D. Robertson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Chris Blask wrote:
> 
[snip]
> > 
> > Oh, it is.  And even there, having more Pen Testing done in the world is
> > itself a move in a positive direction, so that's a good thing by any
> > metric.
> 
> If you're a pen tester.  I can set up a gazillion systems with holes that 
> a pen test won't ever find- pen testing as a stipulated requirement is 
> silly- there are lots of ways to ensure your security that actually work, 
> pen testing at best should be an option in conjunction with stronger 
> methods like configuration auditing of security devices.

I am reminded of Back In The Day when I was learning how to design
software systems and write code.  One theme was consistent across all
that I read: You're further ahead, by far, by starting with good design
and proper coding techniques than ever you'll get by endless hours of
testing and debugging.

Regards,
Jim
-- 
Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam
filtering.  If you reply to this email and your email is
rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my
web form at <http://jimsun.linxnet.com/contact/scform.php>.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.