Re: SCADA
"R. DuFresne" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Organization | sysinfo.com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009, Daniel E. Hassler wrote:
> I agree with your observations but how can an insecure system be considered
> reliable?
The same way a windows OS can be considered "reliable"?
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
- --
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com
http://sysinfo.com
Key fingerprint = 9401 4B13 B918 164C 647A E838 B2DF AFCC 94B0 6629
These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world...,
and then we fucked up the endgame. --Charlie Wilson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJ8NYUst+vzJSwZikRArZOAJ4/Vhv1JL8l1eb8ztpMbKcayE7M2gCdGF8+
uiy3lnkD/fCeAedMVvV2/es=
=U+5s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----