Re: Pix 520 tunnels
Farrukh Haroon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello John You need to make sure that the dynamic crypto map entry is higher than the static crypto map(s). Please have a look at the below link: http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/How_to_configure_Site-to-Site_VPN_client_connection_on_the_same_PIX Regards Farrukh On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Halchishak, John <[email protected]>wrote: > We have two pix (actually three, one failover) 520s that I’m trying to > setup multiple tunnels. The two office locations have a tunnel up between > them with 2 peer address on the main end and a single on the other. We have > need to establish other tunnels at various times to clients. I can’t seem to > get a second tunnel up without adding it to the existing named tunnel config > as a third peer and even then it tends to flap our tunnel between the > offices. Is there some way to accomplish this scenario without causing our > tunnel problems? > > > > > > *John Halchishak* > > *14746 N. 78th Way* > > *Scottsdale, AZ 85260* > > *480-624-4927* > > *480-621-2252 wc* > > *623-505-8905 pc* > > * * > > [image: CIBER - "An Ethic of Excellence"] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards > > _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
image001.gif
(image/gif, 1.2 KB) - not displayed