Re: Pix 520 tunnels

Farrukh Haroon <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello John

You need to make sure that the dynamic crypto map entry is higher than the
static crypto map(s).

Please have a look at the below link:

http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/How_to_configure_Site-to-Site_VPN_client_connection_on_the_same_PIX

Regards

Farrukh
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Halchishak, John <[email protected]>wrote:

>  We have two pix (actually three, one failover) 520s that I’m trying to
> setup multiple tunnels. The two office locations have a tunnel up between
> them with 2 peer address on the main end and a single on the other. We have
> need to establish other tunnels at various times to clients. I can’t seem to
> get a second tunnel up without adding it to the existing named tunnel config
> as a third peer and even then it tends to flap our tunnel between the
> offices. Is there some way to accomplish this scenario without causing our
> tunnel problems?
>
>
>
>
>
> *John Halchishak*
>
> *14746 N. 78th Way*
>
> *Scottsdale, AZ 85260*
>
> *480-624-4927*
>
> *480-621-2252 wc*
>
> *623-505-8905 pc*
>
> * *
>
> [image: CIBER - "An Ethic of Excellence"]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> firewall-wizards mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
>

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
[email protected]
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
image001.gif (image/gif, 1.2 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.