Re: Palo Alto Networks
ArkanoiD <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The idea itself is quite good for some cases (do not rely on port numbers, use traffic signatures *instead*). Though it sounds much as "giving up application control" ;-) The marketing bullshit is awful, though. There is a dozen whitepapers with amazingly little useful technology details but too many buzzwords about "next generation". Despite that, it seems to be quite decent product with (still DPI-driven) L7 inspection, (quite basic) DLP functionality builtin (still much better than nothing), data fingerprinting and reasonable performance (though i am strongly against justifying firewalls by performance). On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 06:00:54PM +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote: > Getting one of their boxes on eval for a couple of weeks. Quite a > broad and generic question I know, but does anyone have any experience > (s) they wish to share? > > Cheers, > Paul > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards > > email protected and scanned by AdvascanTM - keeping email useful - > www.advascan.com >