Re: secure firewall rule management program
Avishai Wool <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mordechai, AlgoSec FireFlow does pretty much exactly what you need. It is definitely topology aware and can tell you which firewalls you should modify to meet a change request. It has rule expiration built in. Supports Check Point, Cisco, Juniper, Fortinet. http://www.algosec.com Avishai disclaimer: I'm AlgoSec CTO & Co-Founder so I'm biased. On 9/3/09, Mordechai T. Abzug <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone have suggestions for a good, secure webified firewall rule > management program? I.e. the kind of thing where users submit > requests for firewall holes and there's support for workflow so that a > requested rule goes to an approver for approval, and if approved, it > then goes to an implementer for implementation. COTS or free is fine. > > Requirements: > > * Secure code! The firewall request system should not itself be a > security hole. > > * The system should allow users to submit rule requests, to be > approved by designated "approvers", and if approved, implemented by > designated "implementers". > > * Awareness of firewall topology. I.e. the product needs to be aware > of which firewalls a given request traverses so this information can > be available to approvers and implementers. > > * The system should include a notion of rule expiration, with > attendant workflow. > > * The system should support change requests to existing rules, with > attendant approver/implementer workflow. > > * The ability to abstract users into departments or projects, > ie. instead of the rule for the accounting web server belonging to > an individual, it belongs to "accounting". Even better if an > individual can submit for multiple projects, ie. a sysadmin who > works for both accounting and marketing can annotate "this rule > belongs to accounting" and the like. > > * Sane role/permissions scheme, ie. user from department 1 can't > modify rule requests for department 2, and the like. > > Desirements: > > * The ability to export rulesets into popular firewall formats > > * The ability to import existing rules from popular firewall formats > > * The ability to search for IPs in rules using CIDR specifications > > * COTS or free. We have some budget, but if there is something free, > we certainly won't complain. > > [People who have been around a while might remember that I asked this > question some years ago. Unfortunately, there were no answers other > than some private, "yes, we'd like that too."] > > - Morty > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards >