Hacker pierces hardware firewalls with web page.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



In reading this, I get the impression this is not a fault in the firewalls 
themselves, but more an issue with the configuration of firewalls having 
been 'tested' by this hacker.  Am I wrong in reading this news in that 
fashion?::


January 6, The Register - (International) Hacker pierces hardware 
firewalls with web page. On January 5, a hacker demonstrated a way to 
identify a browser's geographical location by exploiting weaknesses in many WiFi
routers. Now, the same hacker is back with a simple method to penetrate 
hardware firewalls using little more than some javascript embedded in a 
webpage. By luring victims to a malicious link, the attacker can access
virtually any service on their machine, even when it's behind certain 
routers that automatically block it to the outside world. The method has 
been tested on a Belkin N1 Vision Wireless router, and the hacker says he
suspects other devices are also vulnerable. "What this means is I can 
penetrate their firewall/router and connect to the port that I specified, 
even though the firewall should never forward that port," the hacker told 
the Register. "This defeats that security by visiting a simple web page. 
No authentication, XSS, user input, etc. is required." The hacker's 
proof-ofconcept page forces the visitor to submit a hidden form on port 
6667, the standard port for internet relay chat. Using a hidden value, 
the form surreptitiously coerces the victim to establish a DCC, or direct 
client-to-client, connection. Vulnerable  routers will then automatically 
forward DCC traffic to the victim's internal system, and using what's 
known as NAT traversal an attacker can  access any port that's open on the 
local system. For the hack to work, the visitor must have an application 
such as file transfer protocol or session initiation protocol running on 
his machine. The hack does not guarantee an attacker will be able to 
compromise that service, but it does give the  attacker the ability to 
probe it in the hope of finding a weak password or a vulnerability that 
will expose data or system resources. Source:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/01/06/web_based_firewall_attack/




Thanks,


Ron DuFresne
- -- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         admin & senior security consultant:  sysinfo.com
                         http://sysinfo.com
Key fingerprint = 9401 4B13 B918 164C 647A  E838 B2DF AFCC 94B0 6629

These things happened. They were glorious and they changed the world...,
and then we fucked up the endgame.    --Charlie Wilson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLR3qist+vzJSwZikRAotcAJ9fHEWAOm2N5xFKww7/wA9O+YYdeACfZUEZ
uZciRDQsRu1kZZQUZctPwmY=
=KCsu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----