Re: Firewall best practices
John Morrison <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My understanding of https (and other PKI-based encryption) is that only the holder of the private key can decrypt the data encrypted with the other (public) key in the pair. My view is that the firewall can only decrypt and inspect https traffic if it is acting as the server to the external client. It can't intercept and decrypt https traffic destined for another device - the real server. If it did https would be worthless. Any hacker could buy such a firewall to sniff and decrypt all https traffic. On 23 April 2010 20:18, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Martin Barry wrote: > >> $quoted_author = "Marcus J. Ranum" ; >>> >>> That's why firewalls need to go back to doing what they >>> originally did, and parsing/analyzying the traffic that >>> flows through them, rather than "stateful packet >>> inspection" (which, as far as I can tell, means that >>> there's a state-table entry saying "I saw SYN!") >> >> Marcus, are you referring to DPI or proxies or both or something else >> entirely? >> >> >>> If the firewall doesn't understand the data it's passing, >>> it's not a firewall, it's a hub. >> >> If an application emulates HTTPS traffic and is proxy aware, how do you >> tell >> the difference? > > There are firewalls on the market that can decrypt HTTPS traffic (and I > believe be configured to block any traffic that they can't decrypt) > > David Lang > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards >