Re: Firewall best practices
ArkanoiD <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:03:08 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
_..have you seen qubes OS? Nice thing and can be configured to do just anything.. but the problem lies elsewhere: the percentage of people who care about security just enough to use anything *OTHER* than Windows as their desktop OS is low enough, and dividing that further leads us to almost non-existant fraction. That's why i wish some of those VMs were Windows. On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:18:40PM -0400, Paul D. Robertson wrote: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Marcus J. Ranum wrote: > > > scale between "nothing at all" and "utter crap" it's the SSL > > situation. I guess that having crypto that sucks so badly that > > it's breakable is easier than having to actually ask the question, > > Oh, it's much, much worse than that- you're breaking the old red/black > network model by allowing encrypted and unencrypted packets to/from the > same device from different security domains without compartments. But > more importantly all the effort of the overengineered SSLcrap is that the > entire industry focused on the wrong end of the problem. It's not the > server that needs the protection (not to mention that still also breaks > the traditional crypto model- but I tried to advocate around that with a > trusted OS, "too much work" it seems *sigh*. > > > > In Marcus-land the way we'd do it is have crypto that didn't > > suck, and firewall rules that permitted outgoing crypto only > > to (say, if online banking was an authorized activity during > > office hours) a set of supported sites. Yeah, yeah, I know, > > Marcus-land isn't a real place... > > Even with sucky crypto, the combination of allowing traffic only to > specific sites would be a *major* improvement over the status quo. Couple > that with only allowing trusted executables (Windows Software Restriction > Policies are still better than 98% of what's out there) and you get to a > pretty good place pretty quickly. > > In Paul-land, Marcus land would have lots more beer, and Paul would be > allowed much more access!! ;) > > Paul > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions > [email protected] which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." > Moderator: Firewall-Wizards mailing list > Art: http://PaulDRobertson.imagekind.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards > > email protected and scanned by AdvascanTM - keeping email useful - www.advascan.com > >