Re: PIX 515 7.1 vs: 8.0
John Morrison <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Mar 2011 11:48:16 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian, The PIX guide ( http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix70/hw/installation/guide/515.html) says both the 4FE and 4FE-66 can be used with the unrestricted feature license. A maximum of 6 ports can be used (2 built-in plus the 4FE). On the 4FE the ports are numbered 2, 3, 4, 5 from left to right. The info for the 4FE ( http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_data_sheet09186a0080189f0a.html) says it is fine in the 515/515E. The VAC and VAC+ also can be used. 128MB RAM is enough for the features. Only the VAC appears to require at least v6.3 It sounds right. On 17 March 2011 13:01, Brian Blater <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Kevin Horvath <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 1) enable local buffer logging, manually add a host with IP on the > > inside, then try to access something on the internet, and view your > > logs for errors, view your connection table "show conn det", and your > > xlate table to see where the issue is. > > > > 2) add a default route to the outside interface, everything else > > appears directly connected so you dont need routes for those (you can > > verify your route table with "sh route"). > > > > 3) as someone mentioned, looks like you have dhcpd enabled for the dmz > > and vonage interfaces and not the inside. Add a entry for the inside > > as well. > > > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Christopher J. Wargaski > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey Brian-- > >> Configuration-wise you should have no problems with 8.0 if you know > 7.1. > >> You appear to have NAT configured correctly. You ACLs look good too. > what > >> I do not see are any route statements--do you have a default route set? > >> Also, you should increase the message-length maximum to 4096 given > the > >> rollout of DNSsec. > >> > >> cjw > > Thank you for everyone's input. I've been working on this the last few > days and this is what I've found so far. > > 1. DHCP for the inside is handled by a server on the inside network so > I'm not using the FW for DHCP on the inside. > 2. Default route - yes, the default route was not defined at the time > I grabbed the config for the e-mail. It is defined now. > 3. After being really puzzled by this issue I decided to go back to > the basics and removed all the ACLs etc to make sure nothing was > screwed up and as Christopher said, the config is correct. > 4. Since #3 above didn't change anything I decided to pull the > 4FE-PIX66 card and put in a 1FE card just to check everything. Low and > behold the DMZ port worked without issue. > 5. Figured the 4FE card was bad and got another one. Installed that in > the PIX and it does not work either. With the 4FE installed if you > look at the interface it shows the port down, but the config has the > port active. > > So, now I'm wondering why the PIX I have will not support the 4FE > card. The PIX is a 515E with the unrestricted license with 256M of > memory. The PIX also has a VAC+. I've tried the 4FE in both slots and > without the VAC+ card and it just refuses to work. I guess I could > have 2 bad 4FEs, but I think that is unlikely. > > Can anyone think of what else I'm missing from the PIX that would > cause the 4FE not to work at all? > > Thanks, > Brian > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards > _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list [email protected] https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards