Re: obscure email address formats
"Marcus J. Ranum" <[email protected]> Mon, 23 May 2011 18:25:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ranum.Com |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 5/23/2011 4:30 PM, ArkanoiD wrote: > Is there any good reason to allow email addresses (in smtp, imap and alikes) > in any format different from mailbox@fqdn ? There is a good reason not to allow them: it will help force everyone to use the de facto standard, correctly. If you start accepting variants then the variants will work, and might survive in the wild. I made exactly that argument about X.400 in 1989, if I recall. :) I was trying to make my firewall only pass [email protected] format, because I felt it would be an honor to hammer my own small nail into that particular coffin. :) mjr. -- Marcus J. Ranum CSO, Tenable Network Security, Inc. http://www.tenable.com