Re: obscure email address formats
ArkanoiD <[email protected]> Wed, 25 May 2011 17:59:30 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ah. That was one of the things I presumed to be long dead :-) On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 06:32:36PM -0400, Carl Friedberg wrote: > Outbound (if you are sending e-mail to an external server) there might be either of these formats: > > xtl.com:[email protected] > foobar%[email protected] > > I use both of those formats with a mail forwarding service. > > Carl Friedberg > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of ArkanoiD > Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 4:30 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [fw-wiz] obscure email address formats > > Is there any good reason to allow email addresses (in smtp, imap and alikes) > in any format different from mailbox@fqdn ? > > There is plenty of other stuff defined in RFCs and I wonder if anyone really uses it so > I should *not* just filter it out. > > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards > > email protected and scanned by AdvascanTM - keeping email useful - www.advascan.com > >