Re: IPv6
Paul Robertson <[email protected]> Tue, 9 Apr 2013 16:22:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
DNS-wise, rfc4472 concerns around misbehavior, and 4 vs 6 services are the biggest ones- like v4 resolution of v6 resolvers. I've also heard tales of woe regarding dealing with reverse delegation locally. Paul -- President and Chairman, FluidIT Group Moderator, Firewall-Wizards @compuwar On Apr 9, 2013, at 16:05, Harry Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, I haven't run into any issues yet. > > What sort of DNS issues are you thinking about? Are the resolvers on a > different network? > > Cheers, > Harry > > > > On 04/09/2013 04:01 PM, Paul D. Robertson wrote: >> Has anyone had to deal with allowing v6 yet? Any insight into DNS issues, non-HTTP protocols, or anything else? >> >> Paul >> -- >> President and Chairman, FluidIT Group >> Moderator, Firewall-Wizards >> Art: http://www.pauldrobertson.net >> _______________________________________________ >> firewall-wizards mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards > _______________________________________________ > firewall-wizards mailing list > [email protected] > https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards