Re: Linked-in and its Phishing-like contacts option!
Jim Seymour <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:38:48 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.firewalls.wizards |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20130426113848.086bf080@win0091> |
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:26:01 +0000 "Gautier . Rich" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thoughts? I'm wondering why User Operational Security falls under the > realm of Firewall Wizards.. I think of it this way: Firewall security, in and of itself, doesn't get the job done. You may have the most bullet-proof border the world has ever seen, but, unless that bullet-proof-ness means essentially blocking everything, both incoming and outgoing, it will not be enough. A layered defense is mandatory. One of those layers is end-user operational security. Our goal is to protect the organizational jewels, no? Besides: We've pretty-much beaten stateful/deep-packet inspection vs. application proxy to death, no? :) > ... plenty of users seem to > be perfectly willing to accept the risk (or be unaware of it). Both, IME. > However, not much you can do on the firewall side other than turning > off webmail access... Turning off webmail access? How would one accomplish that, exactly, without essentially turning off web access entirely? As for LinkedIn: I've received so many LinkedIn emails reported as spam at work that they've occasionally been there. I may have them listed on my mailserver at home, for the same reason. (Possibly so. Can't say as I've seen LinkedIn spam for a while.) This nonsense of them asking for "work email password" is grounds, in _my_ view, to block them entirely. That's intolerable. I'm going to see if I can do that. But I'm old school. I don't believe convenience, golly-gee-whiz-bang, and _especially_ "social networking" ought to trump security. Generally my bosses tend to agree. (Esp. ever since a couple of the Big Guys attended some-or-another network security briefing, which incl. a retired FBI agent, and were told that "whatever your network security is, it's probably not good enough" and "for God's sake, whatever you do, do not lose your network geek" ;).) Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.LinxNet.com/contact/scform.php>.