Re: Honeyclients info
David Jiménez Domínguez <[email protected]> Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:20:35 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.honeypots |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Kathy!! As I can see, is like looking for attacks from HTTP, FTP, DNS servers..... (If I'm not wrong) but, does the idea is to do the scan by itself (like a spider) or while I'm using my web browser? Is it going to report the events to a centralized sever... (may be a honeyserver)? It looks like a interesting idea... just like dinamic honeypots.... 2005/4/20, Kathy Wang <[email protected]>: > Hi David, > > Saw your message, and thought I should respond... > > I first came up with the concept of honeyclients back in November > of last year, as a way to detect new attacks. As great as the honeypot > technology is, I consider it to be a passive device. This means it > sits on the network, and waits. Many users nowadays are experiencing > attacks from malicious servers, and existing honeypots cannot detect > these types of attacks. > > Honeyclients are the opposite of honeypots. The purpose of a honeyclient > is to go out and hit servers, thus looking for bad stuff. These servers > can serve HTTP or other services such as DNS, FTP, P2P, etc. > > I wrote a whitepaper last year about the types of attacks that can be > detected using honeyclients, and plan on releasing a honeyclient tool > at RECON. Unfortunately, I cannot release the whitepaper at this time. > The honeyclient will be a BSD-licensed HTTP honeyclient, so you'll be > able to try it out for yourself, shortly. > > Kathy > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 01:09:39PM -0500, David Jiménez Domínguez <[email protected]> stated: > >Hi folks!!! > > > >Do you know what a honeyclient is?? > > > >What is the difference between a high-interaction honeypot and a honeyclient? > > > >Do yo have docs about it? > > > >In Recon 2005 there is a speaker (Kathy Wang) who is going to speak > >about it, but I'm not going to be there.... I have seen that some > >honetnet projects are moving to this kind of technology.... but what > >is it? > > > >------------------ > >David. >