Re: honeytokens
[email protected] Fri, 06 May 2005 17:23:44 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.honeypots |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 06 May 2005 12:54:17 PDT, Vijayakumar said: > databases.I have decided to do my thesis on > honeytokens. > > 1.What are he key challenges involving honeytokens? > > 2.Why has it not been implemented on a large basis? What makes you think they *haven't* been implemented on a large basis? It isn't like the bank or the hospital hangs out a big "WARNING: HONEYTOKENS IN USE" sign. They just *very quietly* insert fictitious information, like a medical record for Tom Cruise or Paris Hilton, and then just wait and see if anybody actually accesses the data. If they find a hit, the security incident is then quietly dealt with in the appropriate manner (you don't want to issue a press release "A Honeytoken caught this hacker", because that would be admitting the hacker got far enough into the database to find the honeytoken...)
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFCe+BfcC3lWbTT17ARAq6rAJ95qinBQ7ZDjvFpDOwKmr7MsfXnmACgoG6Z /Tqkkmj5i8JeLW2joky+f0c= =nXKB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----