Re: honeywall roo: rc.firewall questions
"Earl Sammons" <[email protected]> Sat, 28 May 2005 23:41:13 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.honeypots |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jocelyn, You're right on the money... Bug 292 filed. Hey wait... aren't Roach Motels supposed to have bugs in them :-/ Thanks for the feedback. Earl On Sat, 28 May 2005 02:23:32 -0700 Jocelyn Parker <[email protected]> wrote: >James, > >I think HwRESTRICT (yes/no) is meant to establish whether the >honeywall >itself is to be restricted on the type of outgoing traffic it can >generate itself (nothing to do with traffic going through it, from >or to >the honeypots). If that assumption is correct (I think the >messages you >see when you configure the system using the "interview" method in >the >"menu" confirm this) and HwRESTRICT is enabled, then: > > - HwALLOWED_TCP_OUT and HwALLOWED_UDP_OUT list the TCP and UDP >ports >that the honeypot itself is allowed to open connections to. > > - It is correct that these rules apply to the OUTPUT chain. > >What I don't see is why these rules are located inside the >"ROACHMOTEL=no" section in rc.firewall. The way I see it, >ROACHMOTEL >(yes/no) is an all-or-nothing variable to decide whether honeypots >can >initiate connections to the outside world or not. If >ROACHMOTEL=yes then >no outgoing connection from the honeypots is allowed. If >ROACHMOTEL=no >then all outgoing connections from the honeypots are allowed (but >rate-limited). I think HwRESTRICT and ROACHMOTEL should be >completely >independent. > >I may be missing something, though, because the programmer >explicitly >stated that the HwRESTRICT block should be subject to the >ROACHMOTEL >mode: :-( > >(/etc/init.d/rc.firewall, line 522): ># Moved the following block to this location, should be subject to > >ROACHMOTEL mode > >Makes sense? > >You may want to log a bug report at https://bugs.honeynet.org and >see >what the official response is. > >Jocelyn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.4 wkYEARECAAYFAkKZZCoACgkQk7+e+4lPSm08DwCeMmzGxrpym3Hd2UhWXeynFxt6+hcA nRhbqw6asDG2cJqU9VkJ56jbIHgA =nxtT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----