Re: Arpd on FC3
Maximillian Dornseif <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Aug 2005 11:31:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.honeypots |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2005-07-08 14:18:49 +0200, seamus blarnum <[email protected]> said: > Has anyone come up with a fix or work-around for Arpd on Fedora Core 3? I > keep getting syntax errors and from reading insecure.org and a few other > sources I seem to not be the only one dealing with this issue. You should consider to avoid using arpd at all. If your network is not that big you should be able to use the wonderful new honeyd 1.0 features to get your traffic to honeyd. If your network is complex you for sure should avoid arpd because it will break to much stuff. If your network is really big (e.g. /17) you shouldn't use arp at all but routing to get traffic to your system because most network equipment can't really handle tenthousands of notes on the same segments. See http://blogs.23.nu/antlab/stories/4485/ and http://md.hudora.de/presentations/2005-bh-honeypots-03-honeyd.pdf (slide 7pp) Also be aware that some morons (debian?) decided to rename arpd into 'farpd'. There is another arpd wich is meant as an userland replacement for the kernel's arp cache. So be sure to actually use the correct arpd if you insist on using arpd at all. Regards Maximillian Dornseif -- Maximillian Dornseif Laboratory for Dependable Distributed Systems, RWTH Aachen University Tel. +49 241 80-21431 - http://md.hudora.de/