CFP: IEEE SECURECOMM SECOVAL'06, IEEE Xplore and JoATC proceedings, 2nd Workshop on the Value of Security through Collaboration

Jean-Marc SEIGNEUR <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:42:43 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.honeypots
Message-ID <4447638.1145389363363.JavaMail.www@wwinf1517>
(We apologize if you receive multiple copies of this message)

CALL FOR PAPERS - SECOVAL 2006 - The Value of Security through Collaboratio=
n

in cooperation with IEEE/CREATE-NET SECURECOMM'06, http://www.securecomm.or=
g.

As last year, all accepted papers will appear on the SECURECOMM CDs and in =
IEEE Xplore.
Then, the best contributions will be revised and extended for publication i=
n a special issue of the Journal of Autonomic and Trusted Computing publish=
ed by American Scientific Publishers.

Sep. 2, 2006, Baltimore, MD, USA

Aims and scope of the SECOVAL Workshop:

Security is usually centrally managed, for example in a form of policies du=
ly executed by individual nodes. The SECOVAL workshop covers the alternativ=
e trend of using collaboration and trust to provide security.
Instead of centrally managed security policies, nodes may use specific know=
ledge (both local and acquired from other nodes) to make security-related d=
ecisions.
For example, in reputation-based schemes, the reputation of a given node (a=
nd hence its security access rights) can be determined based on the recomme=
ndations of peer nodes.
As systems are being deployed on ever-greater scale without direct connecti=
on to their distant home base, the need for self-management is rapidly incr=
easing. Interaction after interaction, as the nodes collaborate, there is t=
he emergence of a digital ecosystem.
By guiding the local decisions of the nodes, for example, with whom the nod=
es collaborate, global properties of the ecosystem where the nodes operate =
may be guaranteed. Thus, the security property of the ecosystem may be driv=
en by self-organising mechanisms. Depending on which local collaboration is=
 preferred, a more trustworthy ecosystem may emerge.  =20

The research addressed by the workshop can be roughly divided into three ma=
in areas, each answering the related research questions. Contributions shou=
ld address at least one of these areas. It is expected that the workshop wi=
ll address all of them.

1. It is necessary to define the reasoning behind current trends in securit=
y through collaboration. Does such security solve security issues that cann=
ot be tackled by traditional security solutions? What is the added value of=
 security through collaboration?
In the same line of thought, we should investigate the value of trust as a =
foundation of security. Specifically, changes to the nature of the security=
 perimeter and possible pervasiveness of trust-based security through colla=
boration require investigation regarding scalability of such solutions in a=
 world,
as envisioned by Weiser, where billions of computing entities are woven int=
o the fabrics. Further, we should address the dynamics of such security tha=
t makes it possible to draw from trusted entities (both human and computers=
) and extend trust towards strangers, possibly through the self-learning of=
 individual nodes.

2. The second set of contributions is expected to address the different app=
roaches to and models of security through collaboration. Models of security=
 and trust used for security through collaboration should take into account=
 several aspects of trust evaluation,
including trust collection of evidence, the underlying trust methodology an=
d model, the decision making process and the learning process. Reputation s=
chemes have been already mentioned as one example, but there are several ot=
her possible collaboration models, rewarding for example individual experie=
nce or centrally managed evidence.
Further, models may consist of collaboration supervised by administrators o=
r users or collaboration that is fully automated,
where the computing entities collaborate without human intervention and mak=
e security decisions on behalf of their owners. Self-organising and self-ma=
nagement mechanisms seem to be important for the emergence of a more trustw=
orthy ecosystem of collaborating nodes.

3. Security through collaboration brings its own unique set of problems and=
 risks. For example, privacy can be impacted by different aspects of collab=
oration, as more information about individuals may lead to better trust est=
imates. This inevitable breach of privacy may affect not only individuals
but may also propagate through the network of relationships. Further, colla=
boration invites new types of attacks that require new threat analysis. A w=
ell-known example of the vulnerabilities introduced by implicit trust relat=
ions is the Internet Worm that penetrated 5% of the Internet in 1988: once =
logged into one machine,
remote login into another machine part of the trust relations did not requi=
re another login/password check. Of course, many possible types of attack o=
n different trust metrics exist, including identity usurpation attacks and =
identity multiplicity attacks such as Douceur=E2=80=99s Sybil attack.
Further, certain network topologies can be more vulnerable to specific form=
s of attacks and certain network nodes (e.g. most trusted ones) can be more=
 likely to be attacked, which raises questions regarding additional protect=
ion such nodes may require.

Topics of interest to the workshop include, but are not limited to:

*=09Approaches to security through collaboration

*=09Specificities of security through collaboration

*=09Trust methodologies, models and metrics

*=09Interoperability and standardization of trust metrics

*=09Value and meaning of trust

*=09Trust-based security decision process

*=09Security based on reputation and recommendations

*=09Self-organisation mechanisms for a more secure digital ecosystem

*=09The role of emergence in dynamic trust models

*=09Collaborative autonomic computing

*=09Value and models of networks of collaborators and information sharing

*=09Threat and risk analysis of security through collaboration

*=09Attacks due to collaboration and mitigation of these attacks

*=09Technical trust of the underlying infrastructure used for deployment

*=09Costs and benefits of trust and collaboration based security compared t=
o other models

*=09Privacy and legal aspects of security through collaboration


Submission guidelines are posted on the SECOVAL 2006 website (http://www.tr=
ustcomp.org/secoval/), which always contains the latest updates:
Authors are invited to submit papers formatted according to IEEE conference=
 style 2-column (from a 2-page extended abstract to 10 pages limit).=20
Paper submissions should be sent via the online management system available=
 at http://www.trustcomp.org/secoval/.
Submissions will be accepted until 23.59 PM GMT, May 10, 2006.

For more information please visit: http://www.trustcomp.org/secoval/ or sen=
d an email to [email protected].

IMPORTANT DUE DATES

May 10, 2006: Paper submissions (until 23:59 PM GMT)

June 1, 2006: Author notification

June 25, 2006: Camera-ready copy according to IEEE conference style 2-colum=
n proceedings

Sep. 2, 2006: SECURECOMM in Baltimore, MD, USA

End of 2006: Preparation of the Journal special issue

Workshop Co-chairs:

Brajendra Panda, University of Arkansas, USA.

Richard Anthony, University of Greenwich, UK.

Stephen Marsh, National Research Council of Canada.

Jean-Marc Seigneur, University of Geneva, Switzerland.


Program Committee:

Brajendra Panda, University of Arkansas, USA.

Richard Anthony, University of Greenwich, UK.

Stephen Marsh, National Research Council of Canada.

Jean-Marc Seigneur, University of Geneva, Switzerland.

Giannis F. Marias, University of Athens, Greece.

Laurence T. Yang, St. Francis Xavier University, Canada.

Stefan Weber, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Zoran Despotovic, DoCoMo Communications Laboratories Europe.

Katri Sarkio, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology, Finland.

Christian Damsgaard Jensen, Technical University of Denmark.

Jianhua Ma, Hosei University, Japan.

Filippo Ulivieri, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, Italy.

Karl Quinn, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Michael R. Lyu, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China.

Michael Kinateder, SAP, Germany.

Sini Ruohomaa, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Joerg Abendroth, Siemens, Germany.

Daniele Quercia, University College London, UK.

Lea Kutvonen, University of Helsinki, Finland.

Tom De Wolf, KULeuven, Belgium.

Adam Slagell, NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

Noria Foukia, University of Otago, New Zealand.

Licia Capra, University College London, UK.

Victor S. Grishchenko, Ural State University, Russia.

Konrad Wrona, SAP Research, France.

Ayman Kayssi, University of Beirut, Lebanon.

Lik Mui, Google Inc., USA.

Philip Robinson, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.

Magdy Saeb, Arab Academy for Science, Egypt.

Jennifer Golbeck, University of Maryland, USA.

Lalana Kagal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.

Marianne Winslett, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.

Paolo Massa, University of Trento, Italy.