RE: L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes
"dave" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.microsoft,gmane.comp.security.honeypots |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAxrHNZJmS0hGPUgBgCMtslcKAAAAQAAAAc3Hir3Zr7kKQKDOfC/[email protected]> |
You could simply just look. HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\NoLMHash The "NoLMHash" is a key not a value. Dave >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brad Judy [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:42 >> To: 'dave'; 'Chris Mawer'; [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> Subject: RE: L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes >> >> > >> My win2k box shows that three user-accounts on my windows 2000 >> > >> machine report as being *empty*, <8 and 2 of the three >> > share a NULL >> > >> password LM Hash of AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE. The >> > third hash >> > >> is different and I do not wish to report it here for what id deem >> > >> obvious reasons. >> > >> > This hash means there is no LM hash store which is good. This >> > means the NOLMhash key exists. >> > >> > The one that does show a different one just change the >> > password, it only takes effect once the password is changed. >> > It then should show AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE like the others. >> > >> > Dave >> >> Or it simply means that LM is not disabled, but these two accounts have >> 15+ character passwords. >> >> Brad Judy >>