RE: L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes

"dave" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.microsoft,gmane.comp.security.honeypots
Message-ID <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAxrHNZJmS0hGPUgBgCMtslcKAAAAQAAAAc3Hir3Zr7kKQKDOfC/[email protected]>
You could simply just look.

HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa\NoLMHash  The "NoLMHash" is a key
not a value.

Dave
 

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brad Judy [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 11:42
>> To: 'dave'; 'Chris Mawer'; [email protected];
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: L0phtCrack and Windows 2000 LM Hashes
>> 
>> > >> My win2k box shows that three user-accounts on my windows 2000
>> > >> machine report as being *empty*, <8 and 2 of the three
>> > share a NULL
>> > >> password LM Hash of AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE. The
>> > third hash
>> > >> is different and I do not wish to report it here for what id deem
>> > >> obvious reasons.
>> >
>> > This hash means there is no LM hash store which is good. This
>> > means the NOLMhash key exists.
>> >
>> > The one that does show a different one just change the
>> > password, it only takes effect once the password is changed.
>> > It then should show AAD3B435B51404EEAAD3B435B51404EE like the others.
>> >
>> > Dave
>> 
>> Or it simply means that LM is not disabled, but these two accounts have
>> 15+ character passwords.
>> 
>> Brad Judy
>>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.