Re: [prelude-devel] Re: [Prelude Hybrid IDS] #151: scheduler-dir is hardcoded for prelude-mananger
G Ramon Gomez <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids.prelude.user,gmane.comp.security.ids.prelude.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Quick note: you are alienating the only people who can help you. I don't work for Prelude Technologies. I am an Open Source developer that works on this project in my free time. I am also probably the most active "pure" (not-for-pay) member of the development team. Your talking to me like this makes me want to ensure that you *don't* get any help. Let's look at your request: * I can't come up with a scenario in which I'd want to run multiple prelude-manager systems on the same host. * No one else has ever indicated that this is something they'd want to, either. * As a result of the above, it's assumed that 99% of the user community has no use for the "feature" you're requesting (although you call it a bug). * Right now the development team is focused on getting the correlation engine publicly released, which has been requested and discussed for years, so it's something we *know* a good portion of the user-base wants. As a result, your request is *low* on our list of things to do. We'll accept it as needing to get done, but there are other, more important things that demand our attention right now. If you choose to continue using Open Source Prelude, you need to accept that the things that are "show stoppers" to you, are not going to be show stoppers to us. We are volunteers. You don't have any right to demand *anything* out of us. Normally we try hard to keep up with user requests, and make Prelude the best that we can, but we only have so many resources to devote to development. So, what solutions do you have? Well, you can either develop the solution yourself and submit a patch (hey, isn't that what Open Source is about?), or you can purchase a support contract to ensure that development resources get devoted to your request. I don't benefit by your buying a support contract. You said it was urgent, so I suggested it. There's a triad for software development...Good - Fast - Cheap. You can choose two. You use the word "Urgent", so you must need "Fast." You're also using Open Source Prelude, so you've accepted "Cheap." Sorry, you can't have "Good," too. You *can* have "Good" and "Cheap," but you need to wait (because you can't have "Fast.") If you want "Good" and "Fast," then sorry, buddy, you have to pay. Your choice. Give me a reason to want to help you, because I don't have one now. - Ramon Prelude Hybrid IDS wrote: > People should not be required to buy support contracts just to get obvious > bugs fixed. This is not a feature request, it's a bug. Ignoring prefix is > broken _______________________________________________ Prelude-user site list [email protected] http://www.prelude-ids.org/mailman/listinfo/prelude-user