Re: [Prelude Universal SIM system] #340: New ruleset for PPP/PPTPD/L2TP
"Prelude Universal SIM system" <[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:39:42 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids.prelude.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
#340: New ruleset for PPP/PPTPD/L2TP
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: Shurick | Owner: pollux
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: normal | Milestone: Prelude-LML 0.9.15
Component: prelude-lml | Version: 0.9
Severity: normal | Keywords:
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Changes (by pollux):
* owner: => pollux
* status: new => assigned
Comment:
Overall looks good, just a few comments:
* The line preceding the rule should use the following format:
{{{
#LOG: Dec 4 23:01:36 beorc ppp[24796]: tun2: Phase: Chap Input: RESPONSE
(49 bytes from afonyashin)
}}}
instead of
{{{
#Dec 4 23:01:36 beorc ppp[24796]: tun2: Phase: Chap Input: RESPONSE (49
bytes from afonyashin)
}}}
This allows automated tools to run tests (and check that signature really
matches the line)
* in rule 2, you have the following:
{{{
assessment.impact.completion=succeeded; \
assessment.impact.description=Authenticated successfully; \
}}}
This is redundant. You should use something like 'Authentication attempt'
in description, the completion will tell the result by itself
* not all your rules have an 'id' field
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.prelude-ids.org/ticket/340#comment:1>
Prelude Universal SIM system <http://www.prelude-ids.com>
Prelude Universal SIM system
_______________________________________________
Prelude-devel site list
[email protected]
http://lists.prelude-ids.org/mailman/listinfo/prelude-devel