Re: daq-2.2 with snort-2?
Marcin Dulak <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids.snort.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABJoABbjBR6bRpQ-QOZLpgEcozM4uKsqU1KsGKLP-Sphkoq+NA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Al Lewis (allewi) <[email protected]> wrote: > If you need both on a system you probably shouldn’t use the default build > path. > > Specify the output location using the ‘--prefix’ when running configure. > Then point to the daq installation directory when building snort. > > > I have dropped the idea of having both daq-2.0 and daq-2.2 packaged as coexisting RPMS for now. > > See below.. taken from the configure script (configure -h) > > *"By default, `make install' will install all the files in* > *`/usr/local/bin', `/usr/local/lib' etc. You can specify* > *an installation prefix other than `/usr/local' using `--prefix',* > *for instance `--prefix=$HOME’."* > > yes, I noticed daq's configure/make behave in a non-standard way. Normally one sets the prefix during configure, and make picks up the settings, but for daq one seems to need both: configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 make make install prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr exec_prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr libdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib64 By the way do you have any suggestions how to get rid of rpath performed during linking of daq? https://sourceforge.net/p/snort/mailman/message/35487450/ Best regards, Marcin > > > *Albert Lewis* > > ENGINEER.SOFTWARE ENGINEERING > > SOURCE*fire*, Inc. now part of *Cisco* > > Email: [email protected] > > From: Marcin Dulak <[email protected]> > Date: Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 2:00 PM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [Snort-devel] daq-2.2 with snort-2? > > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Markus Lude <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 03:56:44PM +0100, Marcin Dulak wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I see that daq-2.0 and daq-2.2 cannot coexist on the same system. >> >> Maybe you could tweak the installation, so they could co-exist. >> But why would you want both on the same system? >> > > because I'm packaging daq-2.0 for Fedora/EPEL: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394502 > daq-2.0 and daq-2.2 cannot coexists in the default paths without renaming > all libraries(a,so) and headers. > > Regards, > > Marcin > > >> >> > Are there plans to support daq-2.2 https://github.com/Xiche/libdaq with >> > snort-2? >> > Are there planned releases of daq-2.0 https://github.com/jasonish/daq? >> >> This is not the official repo for daq. Look at the snort homepage for >> official daq releases. >> >> > Another question: is there an advantage from building snort against >> static >> > daq libraries instead of so? >> >> Regards, >> Markus >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms. With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE. Training and support from Colfax. Order your platform today. http://sdm.link/xeonphi _______________________________________________ Snort-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/snort-devel Archive: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=snort-devel Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!