Re: Snort Timestamps Out of Sequence
"Joel Esler \(jesler\) via Snort-devel" <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:59:16 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids.snort.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Is that “out of order” alert a reassembled pseudo-packet? You’d need to look at the packets in the alerts themselves to determine that. (Not csv, but you could look at something like “ -A cmg” to help diagnose this) Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 17, 2019, at 06:56, ROTNEMER, ALAN H via Snort-devel <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have run Snort where we send it packets that are in timestamp order. However, the alerts will occasionally come back out of sequence to our application. > By turning on “output alert”, we can see from the log file that alerts can be delayed. For example, we ran snort as: > > /opt/capture/bin/snort -c /opt/capture/conf/snort/etc/snort.conf -i lo -S OUT_FILE=/data/working/snort/proc/99_99 -N -q & > > And in /opt/capture/conf/snort/etc/snort.conf we had the line: > > output alert_csv: /tmp/snortf1.csv timestamp,msg,src,srcport,dst,dstport > > The CSV log file had several instances similar to this (for business reasons the exact rule texts were redacted): > > 04/16-02:11:06.572717 ,"Rule Type 1 Protocol Outbound Traffic",154.45.216.145,1098,99.99.37.223,51413 > 04/16-02:11:06.606885 ,"Rule Type 1 Protocol Outbound Traffic",182.72.124.202,25283,108.228.86.35,6881 > 04/16-02:11:06.609897 ,"Rule Type 1 Protocol Outbound Traffic",94.254.163.20,19973,99.127.74.163,9836 > 04/16-02:11:06.615137 ,"Rule Type 1 Protocol Outbound Traffic",185.39.113.72,44143,75.35.93.63,6881 > 04/16-01:56:08.636576 ,"Another Rule2 #2",216.68.181.150,65381,12.96.144.101,80 > 04/16-02:11:06.667118 ,"Rule Type 1 Protocol Outbound Traffic",178.254.221.60,8073,99.138.149.126,52241 > 04/16-02:11:06.673093 ,"Rule Type 1 Protocol Outbound Traffic",196.64.27.94,16119,71.128.163.20,6881 > 04/16-02:11:06.676153 ,"Rule Type 3",61.220.63.0,6520,98.67.182.104,123 > > The alert for timestamp 01:56:08 appears 15 minutes behind the ones preceding it. The original packet has the correct timestamp. I should note that this is a very busy system with multiple packets per second being generated. The user-generated rules file has about 23,000 rules. > > Can I get an explanation as to how snort is processing individual packets going through the rules? I would expect to see the alerts come back in the same sequence they went in. > > Thank you for any assistance. If more information is needed please let me know. > _______________________________________________ > Snort-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-devel > > Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort! _______________________________________________ Snort-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-devel Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort!
smime.p7s
(application/pkcs7-signature, 2.9 KB) - not displayed