Re: Matching http_cookie content
"Al Lewis \(allewi\) via Snort-sigs" <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:34:53 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids.snort.sigs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BL3PR11MB5715B1322B62CDBDB4D0836FDA062@BL3PR11MB5715.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> |
No, not necessarily. I don't know what the traffic looked like that they wrote the rule on. I edited the rule to match the traffic that your script generated just as an example. Albert Lewis Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ________________________________ From: Stephen Reese <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 8:27 AM To: Al Lewis (allewi) <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Tatistcheff <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Snort-sigs] Matching http_cookie content On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 10:02 PM Al Lewis (allewi) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Using your script, if the http_cookie keyword is added it alerts. Files used are attached. Does this mean the rule that is being distributed is broken? _______________________________________________ Snort-sigs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.snort.org/mailman/listinfo/snort-sigs Please visit http://blog.snort.org for the latest news about Snort! Please follow these rules: https://snort.org/faq/what-is-the-mailing-list-etiquette Visit the Snort.org to subscribe to the official Snort ruleset, make sure to stay up to date to catch the most <a href=" https://snort.org/downloads/#rule-downloads">emerging threats</a>!