Re: Useful NADS
Stefano Zanero <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids |
|---|---|
| Organization | DEI - Politecnico di Milano |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Andrew Plato wrote: > Honestly, I have never found "network anomaly detection (NADS)" to be a > tremendously valuable technology for most organizations. Perhaps this is because no anomaly detectors exist in the commercial world with just a few exceptions (Lancope and Arbor being the two that come to mind) ? > in the hundreds > of networks I have seen, very few of them are very clean. Most of them > are filthy with a constant onslaught of "anomalies.' A good anomaly detector should filter out those "anomalies", which by the sheer fact of being always there are extremely normal ;) > One thing I have learned in my travels installing IPS/IDS for 6+ years > now is that 95% of the admins out there pay very little attention to the > deluge of data that comes from IPS/IDS technologies. Then may I suggest that probably those technologies were either misconfigured or installed at the wrong sites ? Stefano ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Test Your IDS Is your IDS deployed correctly? Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw to learn more. ------------------------------------------------------------------------