Re: Useful NADS

Stefano Zanero <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.ids
Organization DEI - Politecnico di Milano
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Andrew Plato wrote:
> Honestly, I have never found "network anomaly detection (NADS)" to be a
> tremendously valuable technology for most organizations.

Perhaps this is because no anomaly detectors exist in the commercial 
world with just a few exceptions (Lancope and Arbor being the two that 
come to mind) ?

 > in the hundreds
> of networks I have seen, very few of them are very clean. Most of them
> are filthy with a constant onslaught of "anomalies.' 

A good anomaly detector should filter out those "anomalies", which by 
the sheer fact of being always there are extremely normal ;)

> One thing I have learned in my travels installing IPS/IDS for 6+ years
> now is that 95% of the admins out there pay very little attention to the
> deluge of data that comes from IPS/IDS technologies. 

Then may I suggest that probably those technologies were either 
misconfigured or installed at the wrong sites ?

Stefano

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it 
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=Form&action=impact&campaign=intro_sfw 
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.