Re: About detecting bots....
Raffael Marty <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In order to cut down your time of going through textual logs, I recommend using some kind of visualization to analyze the log data that you capture. There are a number of people, especially ones part of the Honeynet Alliance that have done bot net visualization work. I am working with some of them to come up with some better methods also. To get some ideas, visit SecViz: http://secviz.org Raffael -- Raffael Marty @zrlram Chief Security Strategist @ Splunk> Security Visualization: http://secviz.org raffy.ch/blog On Feb 23, 2009, at 9:03 AM, Chris Brown wrote: > I use the Netwitness NextGen platform, www.netwitness.com this > provides full > packet capture for forensic analysis and incident response. > Excellent for > detecting Botnets and encrypted C&C channels especially when > combined with a > threat feed. > > Regards > > Chris > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] > ] On > Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: 23 February 2009 16:13 > To: [email protected] > Subject: About detecting bots.... > > Hi > > Well I like so much ask your opinion using this way... In this time, > Im very > interesting about, How you can detect bots on your network? > > In the last month I implement on my network Bothunter (you can see > http://www.bothunter.net), but to my it doesnt still work very > well.This > tool dont have found any bot in my network, and doing an analyse > using NSM > I found some of them. > > Well Do you use some technich, tools, or anything else to find some > bots in > your network? I know this is a very new field on research, but maybe > you > know about something that can help detecting this kind of malware. > > thanks for all. > > regards > Armin Garcia > > > > > > >