Re: Intrusion Detection Evaluation Datasets

Ravi Chunduru <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.ids
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I am not sure why you got the impression that I am bashing Snort. I
was certainly not.
I was eluding to have more intelligence in HTTP Engine in snort to
interpret headers values such as content-length value as integer and
provide additional rule  keywords for comparing with the values like
some  web application firewalls do.

Ravi



On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Stefano Zanero
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Ravi Chunduru wrote:
>
>> perspective to change parameters in existing .so rules. There should
>> be some solution like web application firewalls do - deep packet
>> inspection and protocol parsing.
>
> Please, don't bash snort for the point of bashing it. "Deep packet
> inspection" and "protocol parsing" are things that snort and its plugins
> already do. Point out specific flaws or suspected flaws (as Damiano
> did), and not marketing labels.
>
> SZ
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.