Re: Snort with an expert system
Tomas Olsson <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:23:08 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
So after the precious discussion, I have the following questions:
* Would the following setup be useful (interesting enough to be used)?
(a) a set of sensors reporting "interesting" events from traffic
and from hosts (e.g. from NIDS, HIDS, etc.), and then
(b) we use an anomaly detector to detect unusual patterns in
these events
(c) (To make it completely useful, we must contextualize the
alerts but that is kind of a next step).
* Would a third step be interesting?
(d) asses the probability that the unusual pattern is an attack
based on previous classifications
* Richard suggests that a IDS should have been called a "Attack
Indication System" instead. However, to test such as system, we would
not still need to be able to see how many real attacks it can detect, so
it would still be tested as an IDS?
/Tomas
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Securing Your Online Data Transfer with SSL.
A guide to understanding SSL certificates, how they operate and their application. By making use of an SSL certificate on your web server, you can securely collect sensitive information online, and increase business by giving your customers confidence that their transactions are safe.
http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;5001;25;1371;0;1;946;9a80e04e1a17f194