Re: IPS - Cisco vs. McAfee vs. Tippingpoint
Ronny Vaningh <[email protected]> Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:20:11 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.ids |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joel Snyder schreef: >> Hi List, >> >> i need to protect a "realtime" website with an inline IPS from (D)DOS >> attacks. > > You should not be looking at Cisco, McAfee, or Tippingpoint (or, as > some have suggested, Sourcefire or Fortinet). None of them > specializes in DoS attacks, and all will give you fairly poor results > if that's your main concern. This is not to say that these aren't > great products when used as designed; it's just to point out that none > of them are designed to be very good at DoS protections. I'm sure > that the sales droids are happy to tell you that they're good DoS > boxes but, as you found out, they aren't. > > You want to look at products that focus on DoS (and other rate-based > attacks), probably starting with TopLayer and Arbor (someone else > already suggested that), but also Mazu (now part of Riverbed). There > are also some smaller companies that have had success in this space. > For example, one of our customers bought a DoS mitigation box from > Riorey (http://www.riorey.com/) and they think it's the bees knees. > > jms > I do agree with Joel on this. Another vendor worth looking at is the radware defensepro. Ronny ----------------------------------------------------------------- Securing Your Online Data Transfer with SSL. A guide to understanding SSL certificates, how they operate and their application. By making use of an SSL certificate on your web server, you can securely collect sensitive information online, and increase business by giving your customers confidence that their transactions are safe. http://www.dinclinx.com/Redirect.aspx?36;5001;25;1371;0;1;946;9a80e04e1a17f194