Re: cuebot-d infection method
Harlan Carvey <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.incidents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jeff, Thanks for the response. However, it doesn't address the comment that Jayson made, re: post-mortem analysis. I'd still really like to know where to look, and what to look for... Thanks. --- Jeff Bryner <[email protected]> wrote: > <harlan & jayson on where to look for post-mortem > packet traces> > > Lacking full network packet logs, one thing I did > during this one was > look at flow data from our network infrastructure. > > <disclaimer>my flowdata knowledge is > limited</disclaimer> > > This can be misleading, however because internal > flow data will capture > the outgoing attack packets that may get blocked > later by a firewall. > There also doesn't seem to be a one to one > correspondence between the > flow and what the firewall blocked outgoing. (i.e., > the firewall > records more blocks than the flow data shows ). > > Does someone with more flow-data/flow-tools > experience know why this > may be so? > > Jeff. > P.S. Flow-tools example queries: > http://www.splintered.net/sw/flow-tools/docs/flow-tools-examples.html > ------------------------------------------ Harlan Carvey, CISSP "Windows Forensics and Incident Recovery" http://www.windows-ir.com http://windowsir.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------