Re: cuebot-d infection method

Harlan Carvey <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.incidents
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jeff,

Thanks for the response.  However, it doesn't address
the comment that Jayson made, re: post-mortem
analysis.  I'd still really like to know where to
look, and what to look for...

Thanks.

--- Jeff Bryner <[email protected]> wrote:

> <harlan & jayson on where to look for post-mortem
> packet traces>
> 
> Lacking full network packet logs, one thing I did
> during this one was
> look at flow data from our network infrastructure. 
> 
> <disclaimer>my flowdata knowledge is
> limited</disclaimer>
> 
> This can be misleading, however because internal
> flow data will capture
> the outgoing attack packets that may get blocked
> later by a firewall.
> There also doesn't seem to be a one to one
> correspondence between the
> flow and what the firewall blocked outgoing. (i.e.,
> the firewall
> records more blocks than the flow data shows ). 
> 
> Does someone with more flow-data/flow-tools
> experience know why this
> may be so? 
> 
> Jeff.
> P.S. Flow-tools example queries: 
>
http://www.splintered.net/sw/flow-tools/docs/flow-tools-examples.html
> 


------------------------------------------
Harlan Carvey, CISSP
"Windows Forensics and Incident Recovery"
http://www.windows-ir.com
http://windowsir.blogspot.com
------------------------------------------
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.