Re: Strange attack question - seems udp

Mihai Tanasescu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.incidents
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello,

Thanks for explainning the reason for udp ports not appearing in the 
tcpdump output.
Well the Cisco 3750 is the gateway for my clients and not the 
destination host (so I can't figure why it starts choking)

The source IP addresses belong to my clients (those with 86.104 ).

And it usually happens like this:
3/4 ip addresses that belong to my clients contact the same 4-5 ip 
addresses like the one below (70.84.247.164) and start doing 98% only 
upload udp traffic.

Is it possibly for a service to do so much upload compared to download ?


Carles Fragoso i Mariscal wrote:

>Hi Mihai,
>
>Mihai Tanasescu wrote:
>  
>
>>21:00:52.941148 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 11840, flags [+],
>>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp
>>21:00:52.941271 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 13320, flags [+],
>>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp
>>21:00:52.941394 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 14800, flags [+],
>>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp
>>21:00:52.941517 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 16280, flags [+],
>>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp
>>21:00:52.941640 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 17760, flags [+],
>>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp
>>
>>After receiving many packets like these on 3-4 interfaces, Cisco starts
>>loosing packets and acts abnormal.
>>
>>What I find strange is that there is no port specified (src,dst) and
>>that the length of the packets is always 1500.
>>    
>>
>
>It seems to be fragmented traffic. Because the original IP packet
>payload is splitted into pieces, layer-4 header (TCP, UDP) is only
>included on the first packet. That's the reason you can't see the ports
>on IP packets where offset is different than 0.
>
>Does the destination IP belong to the router/multilayer switch?
>Reassembling is done on destination host so fragments should only have
>impact on router/switch if it is acting as end host. That could be a
>reason of poor performance.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Carlos Fragoso Mariscal - Network & Security Engineer/Incident Handler
>Anella Cientifica RREN Incident Response Team (ERIAC) AS13041 CFM1-RIPE
>Communications and Operations Dept.-Supercomputing Center of Catalonia
>  CCNA    CCNP*    GSEC    GCFW    GCIH    GREM    GHTQ    SSP-MPA
>[email protected] phone:+34932056464 pgp:0x0E4EDE07 inocdba:13041*CFM
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.