Re: Strange attack question - seems udp
Mihai Tanasescu <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.incidents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello, Thanks for explainning the reason for udp ports not appearing in the tcpdump output. Well the Cisco 3750 is the gateway for my clients and not the destination host (so I can't figure why it starts choking) The source IP addresses belong to my clients (those with 86.104 ). And it usually happens like this: 3/4 ip addresses that belong to my clients contact the same 4-5 ip addresses like the one below (70.84.247.164) and start doing 98% only upload udp traffic. Is it possibly for a service to do so much upload compared to download ? Carles Fragoso i Mariscal wrote: >Hi Mihai, > >Mihai Tanasescu wrote: > > >>21:00:52.941148 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 11840, flags [+], >>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp >>21:00:52.941271 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 13320, flags [+], >>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp >>21:00:52.941394 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 14800, flags [+], >>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp >>21:00:52.941517 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 16280, flags [+], >>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp >>21:00:52.941640 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 127, id 28639, offset 17760, flags [+], >>length: 1500) 86.104.102.16 > 70.84.247.164: udp >> >>After receiving many packets like these on 3-4 interfaces, Cisco starts >>loosing packets and acts abnormal. >> >>What I find strange is that there is no port specified (src,dst) and >>that the length of the packets is always 1500. >> >> > >It seems to be fragmented traffic. Because the original IP packet >payload is splitted into pieces, layer-4 header (TCP, UDP) is only >included on the first packet. That's the reason you can't see the ports >on IP packets where offset is different than 0. > >Does the destination IP belong to the router/multilayer switch? >Reassembling is done on destination host so fragments should only have >impact on router/switch if it is acting as end host. That could be a >reason of poor performance. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >Carlos Fragoso Mariscal - Network & Security Engineer/Incident Handler >Anella Cientifica RREN Incident Response Team (ERIAC) AS13041 CFM1-RIPE >Communications and Operations Dept.-Supercomputing Center of Catalonia > CCNA CCNP* GSEC GCFW GCIH GREM GHTQ SSP-MPA >[email protected] phone:+34932056464 pgp:0x0E4EDE07 inocdba:13041*CFM >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >