Re: Strange attack question - seems udp
Christoph Gruber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.incidents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BF7E9E17.C98%[email protected]> |
On 18.10.2005 13:21 Uhr "Mihai Tanasescu" wrote as <[email protected]>: > Hello, > > Thanks for explainning the reason for udp ports not appearing in the > tcpdump output. > Well the Cisco 3750 is the gateway for my clients and not the > destination host (so I can't figure why it starts choking) > > The source IP addresses belong to my clients (those with 86.104 ). > > And it usually happens like this: > 3/4 ip addresses that belong to my clients contact the same 4-5 ip > addresses like the one below (70.84.247.164) and start doing 98% only > upload udp traffic. > > Is it possibly for a service to do so much upload compared to download ? May be this is not the right question. You'd should rather question "what the hell is talking to 70.84.247.164?" And 98% upstream udp ist strange in the second step. -- "Theoretisch ist es praktisch, aber praktisch ist es unpraktisch" Bernhard P.