Re: Strange attack question - seems udp

Christoph Gruber <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.incidents
Message-ID <BF7E9E17.C98%[email protected]>
On 18.10.2005 13:21 Uhr "Mihai Tanasescu" wrote as <[email protected]>:

> Hello,
> 
> Thanks for explainning the reason for udp ports not appearing in the
> tcpdump output.
> Well the Cisco 3750 is the gateway for my clients and not the
> destination host (so I can't figure why it starts choking)
> 
> The source IP addresses belong to my clients (those with 86.104 ).
> 
> And it usually happens like this:
> 3/4 ip addresses that belong to my clients contact the same 4-5 ip
> addresses like the one below (70.84.247.164) and start doing 98% only
> upload udp traffic.
> 
> Is it possibly for a service to do so much upload compared to download ?

May be this is not the right question. You'd should rather question "what
the hell is talking to 70.84.247.164?"

And 98% upstream udp ist strange in the second step.

-- 
"Theoretisch ist es praktisch, aber praktisch ist es unpraktisch" Bernhard
P.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.