Re: SSH bruteforce on its way...
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.incidents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 18:05:27 -0000, [email protected] said: > I didn't think it was possible to determine valid usernames by themselves? You > either have a valid username AND password or not. So you take the list of 30-40 "installed by default" userids, add a list of 100 or so common first names/last names, prepend/append a single letter (i.e. starting with "john" and "smith", also try "jsmith" and "johns"). Then try each of those with a list of common passwords. If you're *really* 31337, you apply the SSH timing hole to possibly identify valid userids - but it really isn't needed because it's just as cheap to just try all 40,000 combinations of userid/password (remember, you're doing this from somebody else's compromised system).
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFDXaLqcC3lWbTT17ARApsUAJ9qERpvdFy+km09E3VTyg8argKnoACgpAw+ FuD9LhZ0bhndKl3v/FrXOtM= =gQ+k -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----