Re: ICMP Type:8 Code:137

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.incidents
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:18:27 +0200, "Allan Kjeldbjerg (Acom Internet ApS)" said:
> Hi _mutiger_jh,
> 
> Yes I have notice the increase of the same packets. They could be spoofed 
> but the one I currently
> notice originate from China and is distributed via ISP's in New York.
> 
> Concurrently with these packets we expirence non terminating TCP connections 
> on our Windows platform.
>  - Could there be a connection between the two? Anyone noticed the same 
> pattern?

Out of curiosity, are these fragged packets?  I'm wondering if the first frag
is getting lost and something's misinterpreting a 2nd or following frag - remember
that the *real* TCP/UPD/ICMP header is only in the first frag.  So if your
monitoring tool looks at a subsequent frag, it could be minsinterpreting the
payload as header (similar to the tool that misinterpreted an ICMP as UDP and got
a port number instead of a ICMP type/code).
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQFDYrrKcC3lWbTT17ARAnsMAJsG9M9LLwhfFYSCg3hc1lyBfHOhDwCeJHpQ
SeWYYB9OC89/mnMbPqn7McY=
=VEpk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.