Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>' syntax

"Maxime Ducharme" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.security.incidents
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello

some more info on ip address conversion :
http://www.pc-help.org/obscure.htm
http://gregsearle.tripod.com/spam_tech.html

Web tool to do conversion :
http://www.csgnetwork.com/ipaddconv.html

for the reason about the negative number i dont
have a clue, maybe a bug in their spam application ?

Happy new year to SF members !

Maxime Ducharme



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paolo Scarabelli" <[email protected]>
To: "Mike Davis" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; "max" <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: Strange SMTP sessions with 'helo=<large negative number>'
syntax


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi there,
>
> I remember we were doing this in Singapore a few years back to reach
> some of the website that were blocked by the provider's proxy, it was
> just a matter of converting an IP number (which is a 4 bytes word) to
> the equivalent 32 bit integer.
>
> Something like:
>
> black.box.sk =>
> 66.250.131.132 =>
> 0x42F48384 =>
> 1123320708
>
> I don't know if it works on IE anymore, on Firefox and Konqueror it
doesn't.
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Paolo.
>
> Mike Davis wrote:
> > hehe, didnt even notice max untill i hit reply...
> >
> >
> > the this be a screwy way to get some poor implementation of
> > gethostbyname() (windows?) to interpret as an ip address? i vaguely
> > recall an ie flaw a few years back doing something similar to disguise
> > urls.. but i think they were removing dots like this:
> >
> > http://19216818/pornsite.html
> >
> > dont remember
> > -phar
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 00:33 -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> >
> >>this has been going on for weeks.
> >>
> >>i believe they're all open proxies or spambots.
> >>
> >>(some of us use this as an oracle for open proxies.)
> >>
> >>On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 04:39:14PM -0500, max wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hello all,
> >>>I find this inmy logs throughout the day today:
> >>>
> >>>Dec 28 16:35:52 finn postfix/smtpd[13320]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
pcp0012209034pcs.blairblvd.tn.nash.comcast.net[69.245.57.210]: 501
<-1217882552>: Helo command rejected: Invalid name;
from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]>
proto=SMTP helo=<-1217882552>
> >>>
> >>>Notice that helo section is a negative number (which is why my postfix
rejects the message)
> >>>There are about 5 messages a minute at its peak, and this has been
going on most of the day today (EST time zone)
> >>>Some of the connecting IP's are listed in various black lists, such as
OPM.
> >>>
> >>>Has anyone noticed this as well? Is this a virus or just some new spam
tool?
> >>>Some more rejected messages below:
> >>>
> >>>Dec 28 16:37:50 finn postfix/smtpd[34627]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
cpe-66-75-65-130.socal.res.rr.com[66.75.65.130]: 501 <-1218008120>: Helo
command rejected: Invalid name; from=<[email protected]>
to=<[email protected]> proto=SMTP helo=<-1218008120>
> >>>
> >>>Dec 28 16:37:54 finn postfix/smtpd[13320]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
unknown[219.130.49.89]: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [219.130.49.89]
blocked using opm.blitzed.org; Open proxy - see
http://opm.blitzed.org/219.130.49.89; from=<[email protected]>
to=<[email protected]> proto=SMTP helo=<-1209697480>
> >>>
> >>>Dec 28 16:38:10 finn postfix/smtpd[34627]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
194-144-9-218.du.xdsl.is[194.144.9.218]: 501 <-1209697480>: Helo command
rejected: Invalid name; from=<[email protected]>
to=<[email protected]> proto=SMTP helo=<-1209697480>
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>Max
> >
> >
> >
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFDtKAqqAaEpZvj+VMRAkVgAKCJ2qGHtRSC/k8azkfswBC+qfALDQCfZYEi
> lajhPf57AheuEMKZ0UqmO4E=
> =sBNt
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.