Re: ***SPAM*** Re: Massive SPAM Increase {-2.6} {-2.6}
gabriel rosenkoetter <[email protected]> Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:44:43 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.incidents |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 12:38:08PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > Furthermore, policyd-*****WEIGHT***** (get it?????) assigns *weights* to > various "flaws" (much like spamassassin does to content) and it takes a lot > more than one flaw to reject the mail. The fact remains that this is a fundamentally broken assumption, and policyd inherently broken as a direct result. I wouldn't ever use it based on that and neither should you. -- gabriel rosenkoetter [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFNDWL9ehacAz5CRoRAmeuAJ9psTJy8htXwLmk5M2Dg3fuCELKMgCePx7h dISLFxkg3+wH19MVTwffC10= =TS09 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----