mhtml signature
Derek Edwards <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.security.intrusions |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Thank you, Lola! It's OUR signature now. ;^) With the number of IE bugs that have been announced recently, yet remain unpatched, I think this signature is one to watch for a while, as the spammers, spyware pushers, and ad mongers are using it and other bugs actively (my $0.02). Question #1 is well covered. I'd just like to add a thought to Question #2. I've found that the signature doesn't false positive often, but it has "false alarmed" often. I've had it trigger in various ways, including discussions of the MHTML problem that I found on the Neohapsis archive and on the messages in this thread. None of these has resulted in a code download, though, since these were in the content, vs. in a HTML tag. As I note in the sig definition, it some alerts will be missed if the characters are too cleverly encoded. Good luck on your practical. My Track 3 LMP class is just starting. -D lola marais [[email protected]] writes: > Credit is given to the owner of this signature at > > I am planning on using this signature for a detect in part 2 my GCIA practical. > > The problem is that I am not able to get it working 100% with the data that i have. By not working I mean that it will miss the single packet that I have captured. > > I have captured some data from a network using tcpdump. The capture contains the data content required to trigger the event. The capture contains a single packet for that session, no more. > > When I read the data past snort with the signature enabled, then NO alerts are triggered. If I remove the part of the signature flow:from_server,established and then pass the same data I have 1 event > > The signature looks for an established connection. > My question is: > > 1. Why has the author of the signature decide to look for an established connection? > 2. Does the signature stand a chance of missing some events by looking only for established connections? > > The current version of the signature has the following structure. > > alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"Microsoft MTHML URL Redirection Attempt"; flow:from_server,established; content:"mhtml|3A|file|3A|"; nocase; reference:cve,CAN-2004-0380; reference:url,www.microsoft.com/technet/security/.../MS04-013.mspx; classtype:web-application-attack; rev:2;) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ Intrusions mailing list [email protected] http://www.dshield.org/mailman/listinfo/intrusions